Monadic Truth and Falsity

In Adelaster (2016), A. G. Conte proposes a distinction between de dicto and de re attributions of truth
and falsity, which he illustrates mostly with documents of legal standing, but also with an artificial object
(a false tooth). The present aim is to propose an analogous distinction between monadic (one-place) and
polyadic uses of “true” and “false”, and to sketch some features of its logical functioning with closer
attention to the monadic pole than is usual. One proposal is that, in these uses, “true” and “false” do not
function as opposites under negation.