Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIBG
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIBG

|

UNI-FIND

unibg.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

The intersubjective endeavor of psychopathology research: methodological reflections on a second-person perspective approach

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2014
Short description:
(2014). The intersubjective endeavor of psychopathology research: methodological reflections on a second-person perspective approach [journal article - articolo]. In FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/174393
abstract:
Research in psychopathology may be considered as an intersubjective endeavor mainly concerned with understanding other minds. Thus, the way we conceive of social understanding influences how we do research in psychology in the first place. In this paper, we focus on psychopathology research as a paradigmatic case for this methodological issue, since the relation between the researcher and the object of study is characterized by a major component of "otherness." We critically review different methodologies in psychopathology research, highlighting their relation to different social cognition theories (the third-, first-, and second-person approaches). Hence we outline the methodological implications arising from each theoretical stance. Firstly, we critically discuss the dominant paradigm in psychopathology research, based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) and on quantitative methodology, as an example of a third-person methodology. Secondly, we contrast this mainstream view with phenomenological psychopathology which-by rejecting the reductionist view exclusively focused on behavioral symptoms-takes consciousness as its main object of study: it therefore attempts to grasp patients' first-person experience. But how can we speak about a first-person perspective in psychopathology if the problem at stake is the experience of the other? How is it possible to understand the experience from "within," if the person who is having this experience is another? By addressing these issues, we critically explore the feasibility and usefulness of a second-person methodology in psychopathology research. Notwithstanding the importance of methodological pluralism, we argue that a second-person perspective should inform the epistemology and methods of research in psychopathology, as it recognizes the fundamental circular and intersubjective construction of knowledge.
Iris type:
1.1.01 Articoli/Saggi in rivista - Journal Articles/Essays
List of contributors:
Galbusera, Laura; Fellin, Lisa Chiara
Authors of the University:
FELLIN Lisa Chiara
Handle:
https://aisberg.unibg.it/handle/10446/174393
Full Text:
https://aisberg.unibg.it/retrieve/handle/10446/174393/396620/fpsyg-05-01150.pdf
Published in:
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Journal
  • Research

Research

Concepts


Settore M-PSI/08 - Psicologia Clinica
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.0.0