Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIBG
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIBG

|

UNI-FIND

unibg.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

A comparative analysis of forecasting surface hardness in various aluminum friction stir welded joints: FEM-ANN hybrid versus ANN-PSO-integrated approaches

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2024
Short description:
(2024). A comparative analysis of forecasting surface hardness in various aluminum friction stir welded joints: FEM-ANN hybrid versus ANN-PSO-integrated approaches [journal article - articolo]. In INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/271769
abstract:
This paper compares two predictive methodologies for optimizing friction stir welding process and predicting mechanical properties in the welding zone. The first approach combines finite element method (FEM) with artificial neural network (ANN) techniques to forecast hardness variations, reducing reliance on extensive experiments. The second approach integrates ANN and particle swarm optimization (PSO) to predict properties and optimal FSW parameters, particularly emphasizing hardness maximization. Results indicate the superior predictive accuracy of the combined ANN-PSO approach, offering streamlined implementation suitable for practical applications. Indeed, in the FEM-ANN approach, the average error is around 16.50%, while the ANN-PSO approach predicts hardness with an average error of about 4.80%. Moreover, error increases closer to the center line in both approaches, more prominently in the FEM-ANN approach. However, it should be noted that successful implementation of the ANN-PSO model requires a substantial historical dataset for ANN training. On the other hand, the FEM-ANN approach demands relatively less experimental effort but entails longer computational times. Overall, these comparative insights guide the selection of the most suitable approach based on resource availability and project-specific requirements, providing valuable guidance for optimizing FSW process and predicting properties while considering resource constraints.
Iris type:
1.1.01 Articoli/Saggi in rivista - Journal Articles/Essays
List of contributors:
Bocchi, Sara; Quarto, Mariangela; D'Urso, Gianluca Danilo; Giardini, Claudio
Authors of the University:
BOCCHI Sara
D'URSO Gianluca Danilo
GIARDINI Claudio
QUARTO Mariangela
Handle:
https://aisberg.unibg.it/handle/10446/271769
Published in:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
Journal
  • Research

Research

Concepts


Settore ING-IND/16 - Tecnologie e Sistemi di Lavorazione
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.3.0