Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIBG
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIBG

|

UNI-FIND

unibg.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Preliminary assessment of material extrusion (MEX) for medical applications: The effect of hatch angle

Conference Paper
Publication Date:
2024
Short description:
(2024). Preliminary assessment of material extrusion (MEX) for medical applications: The effect of hatch angle . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/273009
abstract:
Material extrusion (MEX) is one of the most widely used Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies owing to its simplicity and accessible cost. The technique is based on the principle of extrusion of thermoplastic material, layer-by-layer, on a building platform through multiple head nozzles. Metal filled filaments, in combination with debinding and sintering cycles, may innovate and transform the traditional functioning of the MEX technique into a cost-effective alternative for the conventional metallic AM processes. In the present document, the optimal printing conditions characterizing LPBF technology were replicated on MEX technology, with the aim of assessing the effects of the printing parameter hatch angle over the material properties and, at the same time, providing a better understanding of the production of medical metal parts via MEX. Indeed, in this particular context, the use of Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) and Directed Energy Deposition (DED) prevails, requiring MEX-based technique extensive research for its applicability. The influence of a specific AM process parameter, the hatch angle, was assessed following a single factor Design of Experiment (DOE), varying over two levels: the optimal Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) scanning strategy (67°k) and the most common MEX deposition strategy (±45°). Specimens were manufactured, using MEX technology (Ultimaker S5) and AISI 316L filament (BASF Ultrafuse 316L) and tested. Results of the defect analysis, including closed and open porosity, and mechanical properties were collected and statistically compared to determine any difference in the two-deposition strategies. Furthermore, in the analysis, LPBF key characteristics are reported as benchmark values.
Iris type:
1.4.01 Contributi in atti di convegno - Conference presentations
List of contributors:
Sala, Francesca; Nani, Lorenzo; Quarto, Mariangela; D'Urso, Gianluca Danilo
Authors of the University:
D'URSO Gianluca Danilo
NANI Lorenzo
QUARTO Mariangela
Handle:
https://aisberg.unibg.it/handle/10446/273009
Full Text:
https://aisberg.unibg.it/retrieve/handle/10446/273009/698620/21.pdf
Book title:
Material Forming. The 27th international ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Materials Research Proceedings
Published in:
MATERIALS RESEARCH PROCEEDINGS
Series
Project:
3A-ITALY
  • Research

Research

Concepts


Settore ING-IND/16 - Tecnologie e Sistemi di Lavorazione
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.3.0